In Restorative Justice Peacemaking Circle process, and every Circle facilitated by SCVRJP, we identify relationship values at the first round with the talking piece.This is extremely important and requires an understanding of how and why that is so important. A teachable lesson emerged recently and can demonstrate why framing the question is so important.
Technique & How
1) Ask people to identify a relationship. Hand out paper plates
2) Ask them to identify something really important in that relationship. Avoid using the word “value”, you are going to go behind the social mask, by asking this indirectly. Suggest what makes the relationship great, without it, it would not be the same.
3)Handout markers, asking them to write the word about that relationship on the plate. Remind them of the non-judgmental context, lots of things make great relationships, to just pick one for today. Getting again behind their own judgments or preparing what they think they “should” say.
4)Role model, go first, start the talking piece, place plates in the center.
1) Brain connections – engage people in thoughts of loved ones stimulates brain chemicals to promote openness.
2)Indirect ask – – we all want to fit in and belong, we use social masks, our answer change if we are with our friends or our parents friends. That’s good because that creates accountability and social norms. We want to get to the heart of people in Circle, and using the approach reaches a more genuine context.
3) Relationships matter – asking about a specific relationship that the person has, reinforces the importance of relationships and brings in dialogue relvant to what really motivates our behaviors.
4)Topic matter is comfortable – everyone can easily share about someone they have a relationship with. This promotes bonding and a successful first round with the talking piece.
It was observed in Circle that the relationship/values questions was framed as “someone you find inspiring”. Participants picked figures like Gandhi, very few people have a personal relationship with Gandhi, so this question eliminates the personal context of who and what is important in personal relationships. The “someone” rather than a relationship leaves out the discussion of disclosing who is important to us. By a de-personalized question, people can social mask it easier and pick a figure, vs an actual relationship. The cross pollination of discovering others values on relationship values is lost with the question framed this way. The question could still be utilized in Circle, however it might not be the most effective and developing values that the Circle can then commit to use for the rest of the process.